Building for the Long Term

We're one human founder + AI. You deserve to know how we're building for the long term.

Most companies hide this conversation. We believe transparency—even about uncomfortable truths—is what differentiates genuine sovereignty from marketing claims.

John Stroh, our founder, is 74. The technology platform works. The values are clear. But what happens in ten years? Twenty? What guarantees do you have that this isn't another startup that will sell your data to the highest bidder when the founder moves on?

A Charitable Trust to Guard the Mission

We are establishing Te Puna Rangatiratanga (The Sovereignty Foundation)—a New Zealand Charitable Trust that will hold:

• Our Constitution and core values
• The Tractatus governance framework
• Our commitments to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and indigenous data sovereignty
• Succession protocols that ensure continuity

The Trust provides what no single founder can: perpetuity. Trustees come and go. The mission persists.

Māori Partnership: Strategic, Not Charitable

We are publicly committing to building genuine partnership with Māori data sovereignty networks and South Island iwi. This begins with academic collaboration—specifically with the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre at the University of Canterbury—and evolves toward formal iwi engagement over time.

Why this matters strategically:

Big Tech can copy our code. Claude can implement federated governance architectures without us disclosing anything proprietary. The technical concepts are not defensible intellectual property.

But Big Tech cannot credibly commit to indigenous data sovereignty. Their shareholder obligations, scale, and business models preclude genuine partnership with communities whose values conflict with surveillance capitalism.

The CARE Principles (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, Ethics) developed by the Global Indigenous Data Alliance aren't something we invented—they're frameworks we're following. Te Mana Raraunga, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network, has been developing these principles since 2015. We're learning from them, not leading them.

Community Governance Voice

We are developing a mechanism for Village subscribers to have voice in platform governance, weighted by cumulative subscription commitment.

This is not tokenised ownership. It's not a cryptocurrency scheme. It's a transparent system where:

• Your subscription payments accumulate over time
• Cumulative contribution determines governance weight
• Community voice influences Trust decisions
• Blockchain provides an immutable audit trail (transparency, not speculation)

The goal: communities that depend on the platform should have voice in its direction. This isn't charity—it's alignment of incentives.

The Window That's Closing

Six months ago, we might have imagined our technical concepts were proprietary. They're not.

Agentic governance systems, federated architectures, pluralistic decision-making—these are being built by Microsoft, Anthropic, and OpenAI. The technical implementation is increasingly commoditised.

What remains scarce:

• Genuine sovereignty (not "privacy theatre")
• Pluralistic values (not averaged into majority consensus)
• Indigenous partnership (not acknowledgment statements)
• Long-term commitment (not exit strategies)

The commercial opportunity isn't in the code. It's in the trust.

The Market That Exists

Hundreds of millions of people want sovereignty over their personal information, their family histories, community stories, small business operations, and digital legacies.

They don't need to understand fitness functions, satisficing algorithms, or A2A protocols. They need to trust that we won't betray them like Big Tech has.

Our competitors:

Platform	What They Offer	Why They Can't Offer Sovereignty
Ancestry.com	Scale, data, brand	Sold DNA data to law enforcement; surveillance capitalism
Google/Meta	Infrastructure, AI	Business model requires data extraction
Microsoft	Enterprise relationships	"Governance" means corporate compliance, not community values

Our position: genuine sovereignty, pluralistic values, indigenous partnership, transparent governance.

Transparency

• Quarterly updates on Trust establishment progress
• Public documentation of Māori partnership development
• Open reporting on community governance mechanisms
• Honest communication when things go wrong

Accountability

• The Trust will have multiple trustees, not single-founder control
• Māori representation in governance as partnerships develop
• Community voice in platform direction
• Published commitments you can hold us to

Continuity

• Your data is yours—full export rights, always
• GDPR-compliant architecture means your rights are protected regardless of company ownership
• The mission lives in the Trust, not in any individual
• If we fail to live up to these commitments, call us out publicly

If You're a Current Subscriber

Your subscription funds the platform's development. Over time, it will also accumulate governance weight—voice in how the platform evolves.

If You're Considering Subscribing

You're not just buying a service. You're joining a community building an alternative to surveillance capitalism. The structure we're creating means your investment in this community compounds over time.

If You're a Potential Partner

We're seeking:

• Academic collaborators in AI governance, indigenous data sovereignty, and digital rights
• Māori advisors and potential governance partners
• Values-aligned organisations exploring federated sovereignty solutions
• Anyone who believes technology should serve communities, not extract from them

If You're Skeptical

Good. You should be. Every startup claims to be different. Most sell out.

Here's what we offer instead of promises: structure. A Trust that outlives any founder. Māori partnership that takes years to build and can't be faked. Community governance that aligns our incentives with yours. Public commitments you can hold us to.

Watch what we do, not what we say.

We're not building products. We're building a movement.

Digital sovereignty isn't a feature set. It's a fundamental shift in who controls technology and for what purposes.

The metaverse is coming. AI agents are proliferating. Data is becoming more valuable every year. The question isn't whether these technologies will reshape society—it's who will govern them.

The technical architecture enables the product. The indigenous partnership makes it defensible. The emotional resonance—sovereignty over your family, your community, your legacy—makes it worth building.

Questions about this strategy: strategy@mysovereignty.digital

Partnership inquiries: partnerships@mysovereignty.digital

General inquiries: hello@mysovereignty.digital